登陆注册
19397700000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 末日求生之丧尸国度

    末日求生之丧尸国度

    在25世纪,学生暴打教师的事情经常发生。而军方却借此机会利用学生来消灭曾犯过的过错。初三的雷迅.奥斯班级正好成为一年中被选中的四个班级之一。他们在绝望中互相鼓励,在饥饿中奋力战斗,在危险中躲过难关,而那些军人还以教委的名义组织学生击杀丧尸。用饥饿游戏的方式进行生死斗争,最后,嫁祸给了教委。
  • 末世:游戏

    末世:游戏

    毁灭世界的末世令无数人所绝望,但它到头来却是一场游戏多么的可笑在恐怖的丧尸末世前,人类还有心吗?
  • 清穿之四福晋日记

    清穿之四福晋日记

    手持《时光旅行者的日记》,她回溯时光,成为乌拉那拉·玉龄。一手日记,一手四爷,用不了多久,她就会升职加薪,出任皇后,迎娶四爷,走向人生巅峰!【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 武乡,敌后文化的中心

    武乡,敌后文化的中心

    抗日战争中,八路军与武乡民众一道,在武乡这片土地上,团结合作、共同抗敌,先后与敌人进行了大小战斗6368次,歼敌28830人,取得了辉煌的战绩,可以说武乡的山山岭岭上都有过激烈的战斗,沟沟洼洼里都有着烈士的忠骨。《武乡敌后文化的中心》主要收集整理了发生在我县境内一些重大战役战斗,以展示武乡人民在战火纷飞的岁月里,与八路军并肩作战,用小米加步枪打出红色江山的光荣历史。
  • 重生之毒女倾天下

    重生之毒女倾天下

    婚后不到一个月,深爱多年的男人不但残害她亲人,还编织罪名无情剜去她双眼,更纵容他的女人放火将她烧死,她这时才明白自己只是他谋取权力的棋子而已。葬身火海的那一刻,她以血起誓:如果可以重来,她必斩断情丝,倾尽一切保护好所在乎的人!再次睁眼,她竟回到了几个月前。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 英雄联盟之终极死斗

    英雄联盟之终极死斗

    少年楚飞在回家的路上遇到了一只会说话的乌鸦,从此他的命运就改变了!如果一个人获得了英雄的力量他会怎样?成为神明或者成为恶魔!120名英雄,120名选召者!互相终极厮杀!最后只有一个人能活下来!继承了策士统领力量的楚飞能够带着同伴最都活下来吗?“相信自己,每个人都是自己的英雄!”
  • 为爱延续的生命

    为爱延续的生命

    记录了主人公遭遇噩运以来与家人相濡以沫、患难与共的感人故事。作者试图通过那些一痛楚绝望的日子里悟来的道理,告诉天下所有和她一样承受苦难的朋友:在任何艰难田苦申都要珍爱自己宝贵的生命,勇敢、坚强地去战胜一切困难。为求生存,一定要战胜心理的障碍和软弱,拉长生命的极限。
  • 权谋天下之弃女不善

    权谋天下之弃女不善

    韩澜澜从小被一个预言诅咒,说她是红颜祸水,她必然亡国。被赶出了北坤国。被前世的同族女强人穿越,成了一个极有能力的女人。她在一次无意中救了一个小孩子,这个孩子是最厉害的炼丹师的唯一传人。被别有用心的管家杀了出来。韩澜澜发现自己并没有被北坤国放过,依然有人找上门来杀自己。想找到杀她的人到底是谁?
  • 名人背后的悬案(学生最想知道的未解之谜)

    名人背后的悬案(学生最想知道的未解之谜)

    人们不断窥探着名人,也窥探着他们背后的历史。走进他们的世界,了解他们身上发生的种种传奇的故事,继而开启整个历史文明的大门。只要你用心,就会发现若干年前的未解谜团、故事背后的故事将指引着我们不断探求历史的真相。《学生最想知道的未解之谜:名人背后的悬案》分别从帝王元首、将相名流、艺苑文界、逸事传说、遗迹寻觅五个视角,阐述名人背后未解的谜题。探索未知,寻求历史的真相。只要我们秉承着不断探索的信念,那么层层历史的面纱将被揭开。还原历史,解读历史真实人物的是非曲折,从《学生最想知道的未解之谜:名人背后的悬案》开始……
  • 诛绝陷戮上清甲

    诛绝陷戮上清甲

    蔡羽驾驶着上清通天妙有尊号,机甲背后四色光华层层展开。地水风火重新洗炼,这方天地如坠开天妙境。妖族娲皇号展开山河社稷之力,妄想定住天地四极,护全周天大星。其苦苦挣扎,力保不失。“上清机甲面前,天地化为铜炉。即使娲皇补天,又如何保得周全?”道门三清机甲系列,终于还是再次出现在这个世间,昔年的恩怨,今朝要一了百了。