登陆注册
19397700000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
  • 元诗纪事

    元诗纪事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太上肘后玉经方

    太上肘后玉经方

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 道德真经衍义手钞

    道德真经衍义手钞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 狂夫之言

    狂夫之言

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 黔南会灯录

    黔南会灯录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 刀塔时代之天辉夜魇之争

    刀塔时代之天辉夜魇之争

    上古世纪,混沌初开,天地未分,创世神创造了种族,各种族也很有秩序的按照神给他们规划的领地,在自己的领地内生存繁衍,但是资源毕竟总是有限的,在日渐增长的种族数量面前,有限的资源是根本不够自身生存下去的,于是就出现了种族之间的战争,象征着光明的天辉,和象征着黑暗的夜魇时时刻刻爆发着大大小小的争斗,神厌倦了着两个子民无休止的争斗,于是降下天罚,把这两个种族关押在一个异能水晶所制成的球体内,让他们永世争斗,永世坠落......
  • 魅蛇

    魅蛇

    短篇大概有一万三左右吧!内容比较异想天开。就两个人的故事,涉及到的人物不多。一个杀手和伪杀手之间的故事。
  • 夺魂警察

    夺魂警察

    父母被害,孤苦伶仃的大学生。身患绝症想要燃烧光和热的年轻警察。为复仇和爱情奋勇直追的毛头小子。财力雄厚的金融财团,暗流涌动的木府机关。暴风雨来临的夜晚,命运抉择的刹那,谁是盟友?谁是敌人?我要找出真相,将恶人绳之以法。我是吴心,我要成为一名正义使者!
  • 穿越之姻缘错弄

    穿越之姻缘错弄

    她只想从容一世,奈何天意作弄,竟然落入青楼成为卖笑之人。她狠心毁掉容貌又费尽心机装傻装病,只求逃脱命运的掌控。一切都在她的计划之中,唯一的意外却是遇上了他……她是青楼丑丫头,他是当朝大太师。她满身脏污满手血腥,他却翩若谪仙潇洒自如。错位的身份,怎样都不是对的爱情……情节虚构,请勿模仿!
  • 焚神纪

    焚神纪

    那些年,我们失去了笑,忘记了哭。。。。。。。——致终将逝去的青春
  • 峥嵘挽歌

    峥嵘挽歌

    峥嵘的岁月,悲叹的挽歌,英雄的末路,枭雄的崛起。在这战火纷飞的世道,除孤之外,和人胆敢称雄!
  • 那年,流光未至

    那年,流光未至

    你认为一个从小被精神科医生贴上“暴力症”标签的女孩,她的人生应该是什么样的?六岁那年的雨夜,父母领来一个乖巧的姐姐,她的亲情从此被取代,而接踵而来的竟是一系列被流年雪藏的血色秘密!被她保护的柔弱姐姐竟成了绑架校花和一系列糜烂丑闻的女主角!保护着她的至亲姐妹反为她的爱情付出无法挽回的贞洁代价!而那个她不敢爱的男人,始终如雾中的烛火,炽热,却摇摆、暧昧不明。那年,她在十六岁的光年里停止远眺自己的青春。一如,流光,经年未至。
  • 梦不落

    梦不落

    许多人都曾经断言,说我们80后90后,甚至00后都是被宠坏的一代,都是扶不起来的阿斗。我有一个梦想,我希望有朝一日,我可以向全中国乃至全世界证明,我、我、我们,我们能行!今天我们能扛起一个家,明天我们就能扛起整个世界!
  • 爱情路口的转角

    爱情路口的转角

    从来没想过会以这样的方式,伤害最爱的人。朋友问,为什么。他和她,悄然无言父母却说,这是最好的姻缘。
  • 英雄联盟之勇者之心

    英雄联盟之勇者之心

    他是瓦罗兰佣兵们心中的永恒丰碑,是艾欧尼亚生灵认同的唯一女婿,也是祖安与皮城的和平使者,还是弗雷尔卓德统一的曙光。他在德玛西亚以盖伦为友,在巨神峰同潘森比斗。他在厄尔提斯坦与酒桶醉酒,在怒瑞玛沙漠帮助ez考古研究。他是诺克萨斯高层最恨之人,也是诺克萨斯平民最爱之人。他改变了瓦罗兰,改变了虚空,改变了整个世界。