There are many difficulties in the community of women. And the principle on which Socrates rests the necessity of such an institution evidently is not established by his arguments. Further, as a means to the end which he ascribes to the state, the scheme, taken literally is impracticable, and how we are to interpret it is nowhere precisely stated. I am speaking of the premise from which the argument of Socrates proceeds, 'that the greater the unity of the state the better.' Is it not obvious that a state may at length attain such a degree of unity as to be no longer a state? since the nature of a state is to be a plurality, and in tending to greater unity, from being a state, it becomes a family, and from being a family, an individual; for the family may be said to be more than the state, and the individual than the family. So that we ought not to attain this greatest unity even if we could, for it would be the destruction of the state. Again, a state is not made up only of so many men, but of different kinds of men; for similars do not constitute a state. It is not like a military alliance The usefulness of the latter depends upon its quantity even where there is no difference in quality (for mutual protection is the end aimed at), just as a greater weight of anything is more useful than a less (in like manner, a state differs from a nation, when the nation has not its population organized in villages, but lives an Arcadian sort of life); but the elements out of which a unity is to be formed differ in kind. Wherefore the principle of compensation, as I have already remarked in the Ethics, is the salvation of states. Even among freemen and equals this is a principle which must be maintained, for they cannot an rule together, but must change at the end of a year or some other period of time or in some order of succession. The result is that upon this plan they all govern; just as if shoemakers and carpenters were to exchange their occupations, and the same persons did not always continue shoemakers and carpenters. And since it is better that this should be so in politics as well, it is clear that while there should be continuance of the same persons in power where this is possible, yet where this is not possible by reason of the natural equality of the citizens, and at the same time it is just that an should share in the government (whether to govern be a good thing or a bad), an approximation to this is that equals should in turn retire from office and should, apart from official position, be treated alike. Thus the one party rule and the others are ruled in turn, as if they were no longer the same persons. In like manner when they hold office there is a variety in the offices held. Hence it is evident that a city is not by nature one in that sense which some persons affirm; and that what is said to be the greatest good of cities is in reality their destruction; but surely the good of things must be that which preserves them. Again, in another point of view, this extreme unification of the state is clearly not good; for a family is more self-sufficing than an individual, and a city than a family, and a city only comes into being when the community is large enough to be self-sufficing. If then self-sufficiency is to be desired, the lesser degree of unity is more desirable than the greater.
同类推荐
热门推荐
妃你莫属:王爷请娶我
他是王爷了怎么了,只要她喜欢,他就得娶她,什么公主什么圣女,她都不要管,因为爱上了,谁也不能来阻止,哪怕是父王母后,哪怕是王公大臣,哪怕是三纲五常,只要她喜欢就够了,只要他答应就够了,爱是两个人的事,就算真的到了那个时候,她会嫁的,但那人必须是…终极BOSS:校草别走嘛
陆曼曼,祁国四公主,文能提笔安天下,武能马上定乾坤,却未曾想,受了身边最亲的人背叛,穿越成为现代大小姐。当她遇见他。苏子昊:你若与我并肩作战,便不要想着背叛。陆曼曼:我的字典里,从始至终便没有背叛二字。当她的爱人跌入虎穴,生死未卜。端木落:你希望我们怎么做?陆曼曼:找到事情的真相!当她被人追杀。陆曼曼:他们想看我亡命天涯,但我要终结这一切!当她被人绑架。陆曼曼:我一无所有,如果你够聪明,你就会感觉到害怕!她不在乎什么法律,她不在乎什么证据,她只在乎什么是正确的!且看古代公主如何在异世扭转乾坤,独步天下!历代官场智慧谋略文库(智慧谋略文库)
周文王派人挖池塘,挖出一具尸骨,官吏把此事禀告文王,文王说:“重新安葬他。”官吏说:“这具尸骨是没有主的。”文王说:“拥有天下的人是天下之主,拥有一国的人是一国之主。现在难道我不是他的主人吗?”于是让官吏用衣棺把那具尸骨改葬在别处