登陆注册
20070900000021

第21章 6

They differ in that 'spontaneity' is the wider term. Every result of chance is from what is spontaneous, but not everything that is from what is spontaneous is from chance.

Chance and what results from chance are appropriate to agents that are capable of good fortune and of moral action generally. Therefore necessarily chance is in the sphere of moral actions. This is indicated by the fact that good fortune is thought to be the same, or nearly the same, as happiness, and happiness to be a kind of moral action, since it is well-doing. Hence what is not capable of moral action cannot do anything by chance. Thus an inanimate thing or a lower animal or a child cannot do anything by chance, because it is incapable of deliberate intention; nor can 'good fortune' or 'ill fortune' be ascribed to them, except metaphorically, as Protarchus, for example, said that the stones of which altars are made are fortunate because they are held in honour, while their fellows are trodden under foot. Even these things, however, can in a way be affected by chance, when one who is dealing with them does something to them by chance, but not otherwise.

The spontaneous on the other hand is found both in the lower animals and in many inanimate objects. We say, for example, that the horse came 'spontaneously', because, though his coming saved him, he did not come for the sake of safety. Again, the tripod fell 'of itself', because, though when it fell it stood on its feet so as to serve for a seat, it did not fall for the sake of that.

Hence it is clear that events which (1) belong to the general class of things that may come to pass for the sake of something, (2) do not come to pass for the sake of what actually results, and (3) have an external cause, may be described by the phrase 'from spontaneity'. These 'spontaneous' events are said to be 'from chance' if they have the further characteristics of being the objects of deliberate intention and due to agents capable of that mode of action. This is indicated by the phrase 'in vain', which is used when A which is for the sake of B, does not result in B. For instance, taking a walk is for the sake of evacuation of the bowels; if this does not follow after walking, we say that we have walked 'in vain' and that the walking was 'vain'. This implies that what is naturally the means to an end is 'in vain', when it does not effect the end towards which it was the natural means-for it would be absurd for a man to say that he had bathed in vain because the sun was not eclipsed, since the one was not done with a view to the other. Thus the spontaneous is even according to its derivation the case in which the thing itself happens in vain. The stone that struck the man did not fall for the purpose of striking him; therefore it fell spontaneously, because it might have fallen by the action of an agent and for the purpose of striking. The difference between spontaneity and what results by chance is greatest in things that come to be by nature; for when anything comes to be contrary to nature, we do not say that it came to be by chance, but by spontaneity. Yet strictly this too is different from the spontaneous proper; for the cause of the latter is external, that of the former internal.

We have now explained what chance is and what spontaneity is, and in what they differ from each other. Both belong to the mode of causation 'source of change', for either some natural or some intelligent agent is always the cause; but in this sort of causation the number of possible causes is infinite.

Spontaneity and chance are causes of effects which though they might result from intelligence or nature, have in fact been caused by something incidentally. Now since nothing which is incidental is prior to what is per se, it is clear that no incidental cause can be prior to a cause per se. Spontaneity and chance, therefore, are posterior to intelligence and nature. Hence, however true it may be that the heavens are due to spontaneity, it will still be true that intelligence and nature will be prior causes of this All and of many things in it besides.

同类推荐
  • 三十六水法

    三十六水法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 策林

    策林

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 葆光录

    葆光录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 救度佛母二十一种礼赞经

    救度佛母二十一种礼赞经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 君臣上

    君臣上

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 邪王轻宠:嫡女毒妃

    邪王轻宠:嫡女毒妃

    前世,她纯正善良却被王爷丈夫亲手灭了全家。这一世,她逆天重生,得罪她的人,全都不得好死!惩庶妹,诱“渣”夫,护爹娘,保沈家。等等,前世中山狼原是今世良人?吃干抹净不说,还说上一世不是故意的?
  • 黑光默示录

    黑光默示录

    “叮……给你一次新生你是否愿意追寻?”正当某宅因先天性疾病而死时在他的脑海中炸鸣“我愿意(话说他妈怎么有种求婚的时候的感觉)”“叮……黑光原型终极版病毒系统正式与宿主绑定……叮……绑定完成”于是乎超神时间到(文渣手残,只是想圆一下自己的白日梦,别介)越来越奇怪了,作者君乱入元素了哈。
  • 上海闯荡记

    上海闯荡记

    没有显赫的家世,万人中普通的一名屌丝。顾之阳离开了两年工作的地方,毅然来到了上海。虽然处处碰壁,但他却不堕落。相反,在上海,他收获了瞩目的事业和甜美的爱情。生活和爱情就像个无底洞,是一个人跳下去还是两个人爬上来?在这里,一切归你选择。
  • 上武志异

    上武志异

    二十年前,上武道宗发生一场惊天变乱,九经绝地醉武君一人之力诛杀至上武神殿,而道宗宗主道尊此刻却闭关未出,上武道宗四十九宫玄阶才子全数阵亡,最后由三位护教才子一举诛杀醉武君于紫焰神鼎之中。二十年后,主人公玉小灿踏上了上武道宗修炼之路,正值四灵神阵危机之际,主人公在不断的修炼与历练中揭开了上武道宗多年不为人知的秘密,主人公迷一样的身世又将牵扯出何种的惊天秘密?主人公随身携带的中天剑又隐藏着什么不为人知的秘密,而背后神秘的异武魔域又在盘算什么?究竟何人是邪?何人是正?且看岚难为大家揭秘这一段侠骨柔情、恩怨难断的故事。
  • 异界闻战

    异界闻战

    君欲守土复开疆血犹热志四方我为君擦拭缨枪为君披戎装君道莫笑醉沙场看九州烽烟扬我唱战歌送君往且看宅男如何在混战不休的异界生存····
  • 黑道公主的王子殿下

    黑道公主的王子殿下

    三个黑道公主:蓝冰芯(高冷)、泪以樱(成熟)、夏子言(活泼)四个黑道王子:欧夜辰(高冷)、蓝野颢(成熟)、左齐、(暖男)冰胜皓(花花公子)他(她)们是六大家族的心肝宝贝不让任何人伤害他们!!让我们尽情期待他们的爱恋吧!
  • 千古神兵

    千古神兵

    穷苦少年得到神域传承,觉醒兵魂,铸神兵,斩邪恶,终成无上神兵!
  • tfboys之神秘穿越

    tfboys之神秘穿越

    本文简述的是三小只在一次奇妙的旅行中获得美好的感受以及爱情
  • 俞笙,只爱你

    俞笙,只爱你

    我曾疯狂的追求过他,给他当过情人,做过老婆,也被他生生打掉了孩子,送进了精神病院。最后的最后,也是我…亲手把他送上了绝路,让他再无生还可能。周梓琛,如果有来世,我还会爱你,只是这辈子,不会放过你。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 打劫

    打劫

    刘浪,生于70年代,中国作家协会会员,黑龙江省作家协会签约作家,鲁迅文学院第十五期高研班学员。若干诗歌、中短篇小说发表于《飞天》《文学界》《山花》《作品》等数十家期刊,多篇小说被《小说选刊》等报刊转载。