登陆注册
20270300000023

第23章

WE have explained under what conditions 'combination', 'contact', and 'action-passion' are attributable to the things which undergo natural change. Further, we have discussed 'unqualified'

coming-to-be and passing-away, and explained under what conditions they are predicable, of what subject, and owing to what cause.

Similarly, we have also discussed 'alteration', and explained what 'altering' is and how it differs from coming-to-be and passing-away.

But we have still to investigate the so-called 'elements' of bodies.

For the complex substances whose formation and maintenance are due to natural processes all presuppose the perceptible bodies as the condition of their coming-to-be and passing-away: but philosophers disagree in regard to the matter which underlies these perceptible bodies. Some maintain it is single, supposing it to be, e.g. Air or Fire, or an 'intermediate' between these two (but still a body with a separate existence). Others, on the contrary, postulate two or more materials-ascribing to their 'association' and 'dissociation', or to their 'alteration', the coming-to-be and passing-away of things.

(Some, for instance, postulate Fire and Earth: some add Air, making three: and some, like Empedocles, reckon Water as well, thus postulating four.)Now we may agree that the primary materials, whose change (whether it be 'association and dissociation' or a process of another kind)results in coming-to-be and passingaway, are rightly described as 'originative sources, i.e. elements'. But (i) those thinkers are in error who postulate, beside the bodies we have mentioned, a single matter-and that corporeal and separable matter. For this 'body' of theirs cannot possibly exist without a 'perceptible contrariety': this 'Boundless', which some thinkers identify with the 'original real', must be either light or heavy, either cold or hot. And (ii) what Plato has written in the Timaeus is not based on any precisely-articulated conception. For he has not stated clearly whether his 'Omnirecipient" exists in separation from the 'elements'; nor does he make any use of it. He says, indeed, that it is a substratum prior to the so-called 'elements'-underlying them, as gold underlies the things that are fashioned of gold. (And yet this comparison, if thus expressed, is itself open to criticism. Things which come-to-be and pass-away cannot be called by the name of the material out of which they have come-tobe: it is only the results of 'alteration'

which retain the name of the substratum whose 'alterations' they are. However, he actually says' that the truest account is to affirm that each of them is "gold"'.) Nevertheless he carries his analysis of the 'elements'-solids though they are-back to 'planes', and it is impossible for 'the Nurse' (i.e. the primary matter) to be identical with 'the planes'.

Our own doctrine is that although there is a matter of the perceptible bodies (a matter out of which the so-called 'clements'

come-to-be), it has no separate existence, but is always bound up with a contrariety. A more precise account of these presuppositions has been given in another work': we must, however, give a detailed explanation of the primary bodies as well, since they too are similarly derived from the matter. We must reckon as an 'originative source' and as 'primary' the matter which underlies, though it is inseparable from, the contrary qualities: for the hot' is not matter for 'the cold' nor 'the cold' for 'the hot', but the substratum is matter for them both. We therefore have to recognize three 'originative sources': firstly that which potentially perceptible body, secondly the contrarieties (I mean, e.g. heat and cold), and thirdly Fire, Water, and the like. Only 'thirdly', however: for these bodies change into one another (they are not immutable as Empedocles and other thinkers assert, since 'alteration' would then have been impossible), whereas the contrarieties do not change.

Nevertheless, even so the question remains: What sorts of contrarieties, and how many of them, are to be accounted 'originative sources' of body? For all the other thinkers assume and use them without explaining why they are these or why they are just so many.

同类推荐
  • 劝发菩提心集

    劝发菩提心集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • LITTLE DORRIT

    LITTLE DORRIT

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 禅宗杂毒海

    禅宗杂毒海

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Hamlet, Prince of Denmark

    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说优填王经

    佛说优填王经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 玄控九天

    玄控九天

    圣玄大陆,实力为尊。少年林炎,因单一属性的体质而无法修炼,受尽屈辱。一朝体质觉醒,炼玄气,控天火,掌永生道义!少年一步步踏上大陆巅峰,以玄战,控九天!
  • 推理记得带纸巾

    推理记得带纸巾

    得出真相准备有三,收到狸猫资讯,避开罗宾误导,摸出一张纸巾。男人不带纸可不行啊……
  • 粉嫩太后:不和皇上玩亲亲

    粉嫩太后:不和皇上玩亲亲

    一眨眼她变成了皇后,再一眨眼变太后,再一眨眼她吓得一脚将躺在身边的男人踹下床去:“死小子,我是你后妈!”,气死她了,皇帝和太后拜堂,本来就天该打雷劈了!他还敢往床上爬,要死了!某男阴险一笑:“做妈太辛苦,做我媳妇吧!”
  • 平安守护神

    平安守护神

    不一样的人生,不一样的世界。平安来了!看尽人间红尘,历练洪荒宇宙。手掌乾坤,脚踏日月,一腔热血屠尽奸邪,只为还那世间一个朗朗乾坤,给你守护一个众生平等的平安人生!
  • 古境离殇之剑中仙

    古境离殇之剑中仙

    一阕幻化如梦的古境,将时光染上一层雪沙,是浩瀚之中固有的意境,还是永恒间不变的神话。而如今,他翩然离去,只留下她,还有一把古剑,独自黯然,留在古境等他归来。
  • 神州志之镜花水月

    神州志之镜花水月

    神州不是一个人的舞台,若真只有一个人,那是否也太过无聊.传奇是那人在那时,那地做了一件不得了的那事.若无天时地利人和,也粉饰不出一个古今称颂的传奇.五段封武,上古武装,天道神兵,天下十军,大陆七圣......称谓之多,不胜枚举,但都说不明,道不尽我辈的风流英姿.小生不才,原执这手中的凡欲之笔,为大家勾勒出一片你心中的传奇!
  • 侠骨柔情之豪门逆女

    侠骨柔情之豪门逆女

    江湖多险滩,问丽人如何敢独闯?侠客豪气冲霄汉,同许愿,共相伴,真情可作梯,妹子敢登天!君臣恩,豪门怨,不敌三生订约一世姻缘。弱女子,泪涟涟;穷家子弟,真心比铁坚,两情相悦,意绵绵。不惧恶魔贪狠如狼,何屑登徒之子巧舌如簧,此心早已决,独哥哥可依傍。儿女情长,奈何家国恩仇;故园已破,爹娘亦双亡,此恨无涯,苦叹凄怜!妹子深情款款,何人敢承欢?
  • 绝色王妃:月夜蔷薇

    绝色王妃:月夜蔷薇

    “对不起,我…咳咳…不能守信了…”她黑漆如夜的眸子里划过一道如有若无的黯淡。“不!不要离开我!我不能再一次失去你了。”他仓促慌乱地抱住她血淋淋的身躯,是那样脆弱,仿佛下一刻她便会离去。这种感受,他尝过一次,已不想再第二次了。“我…”她忽然咧开一抹灿烂的微笑,血从唇角淌溢出许多,“我会死吗…咳咳,玦…”呼吸渐渐地变弱。“你不会的,我们说过要在一起的!”他眼神中透着一股深深的绝望与痛苦。手不由收紧起来。“玦,谢谢你…一直以来的咳咳陪伴…”她缓缓闭上了如蝉翼般睫毛,悄然睡去了…“弥儿!”他瞪红一双眼,朝天怒吼一声。半晌,他抬起充斥着浓郁的戾气血眸,不起一丝波澜。“你们必须都给弥儿陪葬!”
  • 狂暴盾战

    狂暴盾战

    狂暴勇猛,兽血沸腾战士的威武势不可挡
  • 冬雪未寒

    冬雪未寒

    我抬头看着红的深沉的余晖喃喃自语“宋炎,我是什么时候开始喜欢你的呢?大概是那次照顾甚至更早吧...”